Sep 132019
 
2019 elections resource kit | CFSC (Quakers)

Canadians will go to the polls to vote in a federal election on October 21. Canadian Quakers care about many peace and social issues. This Election Resource Kit has been created to help you ask informed questions of all candidates seeking election to know where they stand on several key issues that CFSC works on. At the end of this Kit you’ll see links to other kits with many more questions on other topics that may be of concern to you. You can read the resource below, or download it in PDF to make it easier to print and share.

 

Issues Canadian Friends Service Committee works on

 
penal abolition means getting beyond a punitive mindset and thinking about how to most effectively prevent, repair and move beyond harm

Criminal Justice

Canada spends more than $20 billion on criminal justice each year. This expense has increased while Canada’s crime rate has declined. Spending on prison security, courts and corrections diverts funds from more effective and essential services that support healing and rehabilitation for offenders, victims, families, and communities.

Most prisoners return to their community with little support, including housing, income, healthcare or social services to help them continue healing and to reintegrate back into society. This propels people back into negative patterns and behaviours that led to their incarceration (e.g. limited employment, homelessness, mental health or addiction, unhealthy family relationships). As a result, their prison experiences can lead to increased risk of re-offending and limit their opportunities to change their life path.

Questions:

Public Safety

  1. I understand that all members of parliament have access to correctional facilities. Have you ever been inside a prison? Have you spoken to people inside prison?
  2. Justice is often viewed through one of two lenses. One lens is focused on punishment. The other lens is restorative, which sees crime as part of a bigger social problem and tries to help people build a healthier approach to their lives by increasing supports around them. How does your party feel about the current level of investment in these two approaches? What changes would your party propose to the correctional system as it currently is?
  3. Recently, we have heard how the positive effects of restorative justice and focus on rehabilitation has been proven in Atlantic Canada and in Youth Justice to decrease the prison population and reduce reoffending significantly. What are your views and policies on restorative justice and what investments does your party intend to make in rehabilitation for prisoners?
  4. Many people with mental health or substance addictions are not provided adequate healthcare in the community, and there is little healthcare available if people go to prison. Does your party have any policies in relation to mental health and addiction healthcare, both in the community and in prisons?
  5. Canada has a clear over-representation of Indigenous people in prisons, particularly Indigenous youth and Indigenous women. What does your party intend to do to reduce the over-representation of Indigenous people in the Justice system?
 

Children and youth

  1. Canada has ratified and championed the United Nations’ Convention on the Rights of the Child, including to protect and promote the best interests of the child. However, when we look at the impact on children whose parents are sent to prison, there is no sign in our criminal justice system that children are taken into consideration. Many children enter child welfare because their parents are in prison, and this particularly affects Indigenous children. Does your party have any plans to address the impacts of parental incarceration on children as per Canada’s international obligations?
  2. Recently the Ontario Government shut the Ontario Child Advocate’s office, creating another gap in protection and support for children, especially vulnerable children like those in the justice system or in child welfare. Children and youth in Canada need a National Advocate to help close the gaps. In a 2012 review of Canada, the UN’s Committee on the Rights of the Child recommended that Canada take “measures to establish a federal Children’s Ombudsman” and ensure that the Ombudsman is provided with the necessary resources  and independence (Concluding Observations, paragraph 23).[1] Will your party implement this recommendation?
 

Indigenous peoples’ human rights

UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples

The Truth and Reconciliation Commission called the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples the “framework for reconciliation.” The UN Declaration provides the necessary principles, norms, and standards for reconciliation to flourish in twenty-first-century Canada. Canada endorsed the UN Declaration in 2010. Private member’s Bill C-262 called for Canada to ensure that its laws are consistent with the UN Declaration. The Bill was passed in 2018 by the House of Commons but was deliberately delayed by a handful of Conservative Senators, which eventually meant the bill did not become law.

Questions:

  1. Will your party, in consultation and cooperation with Indigenous peoples, reintroduce legislation to ensure the laws of Canada are consistent with the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples? Does your party commit that such legislation will meet the minimum standard set in Bill C-262 and not fall below it?
  2. Will your party, in cooperation and consultation with Indigenous peoples, develop a national action plan, strategies, and other concrete measures to ensure full and effective implementation of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples?
 

Missing and murdered Indigenous women and girls

  1. In June, the Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls Inquiry report, Reclaiming Power and Place was released.[2] What will you do to work with Indigenous peoples to enact the Calls to Justice listed in the report?
 

Truth and Reconciliation Commission Calls to Action

Questions:

  1. Will you, in consultation and collaboration with Indigenous peoples, do the significant remaining work to fully implement the 94 Calls to Action[3] of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada?
  2. Will you work with other jurisdictions to ensure that all of the Calls to Action are implemented?
 
Figure from: National Defence, Strong, Secure, Engaged: Canada’s Defence Policy, 2017, p. 98. The green area represents the massive increase in announced military spending.

Peace

Military spending

Without any parliamentary or public debates and without having made it part of their platform in the 2015 election, in 2017 the Liberal Government announced a plan for an astonishing 73% increase in military spending. The majority of the spending would be on fighter jets and war ships, with a 5% increase in sailors, soldiers, and air force personnel.[4] Given Canada’s history with military procurement, it seems quite likely that the price tag for this new hardware could be much higher than what we’ve been told so far.

Question:

  1. Will you commit to rolling back this wasteful new military spending and investing these billions of dollars where they’re needed: in programs like healthcare and education?
 

Arms trade

In 2016 the Globe and Mail reported that Canada was the second largest supplier of arms to the Middle East.[5] The Canadian Commercial Corporation (CCC) acts as a broker to sell Canadian products abroad, including weapons. In February 2014 it signed a deal for Canada to sell so-called “light armored vehicles” to Saudi Arabia, with heavy penalties for breaking the contract. Yet that was two years before Global Affairs Canada had even reviewed this deal for its human rights implications! Canada recently acceded to the Arms Trade Treaty, an international Treaty meant to save lives by preventing the flow of arms to conflict zones. If Canada is going to take its commitments to promoting peace and human rights seriously, it clearly needs to make CCC and other Crown Corporations subject to more meaningful regulation.

The majority of Canada’s weapons exports go to the US. Some of these Canadian weapons or parts later turned into weapons may be sent on from the US to other countries, whatever their human rights records. Canada can send these military goods or goods destined for military end uses to the US without reporting on them or doing human rights reviews. Failing to regulate arms exports to the US is a violation of the Arms Trade Treaty, which applies globally.

Question:

  1. Bringing Canada’s Export and Import Permits Act in line with the minimum requirements of the Arms Trade Treaty would include regulating the Canadian Commercial Corporation and other Crown Corporations and ensuring human rights reviews of arms exports to the US. Will you commit to making these minimum necessary changes so that Canadian weapons don’t continue to fuel wars and brutal human rights abuses?
 

Department of Peace

The UN and World Bank confirm that in the most pessimistic scenario the net savings of war prevention for the international community, not even the countries involved directly in the war, would be almost $700 million per year, and “the benefits of prevention increase over time whereas the costs fall.”[6] These numbers don’t take into account war’s major contributions to pollution and the climate crisis. They don’t take into account the immeasurable human costs of war. Clearly prevention matters. Yet Canada has no body tasked with truly making prevention a top priority.

The Canadian Peace Initiative seeks to establish a Cabinet-level Minister of Peace within the Government of Canada, and a federal Department of Peace.[7] The Department would make Canada a leader in developing and implementing a coordinated and coherent approach to violence prevention and peacebuilding domestically and internationally.

Questions:

  1. Are nonviolent strategies for dealing with conflict adequately emphasized and resourced within Canada? What would you change?
  2. What is your position on the establishment of a Canadian Department of Peace or other means to prioritize the prevention of violent conflict?
 

Synthetic biology

A suite of new techniques called “synthetic biology” is advancing at a rapid pace. Chinese scientist He Jiankui shocked the world recently in announcing that he had edited the DNA of two human babies in ways that could be inherited by future generations. In Canada this human experimentation would have been illegal, but some are calling to loosen these regulations. Other uses of techniques like CRISPR are legal in Canada and genetically altered products are already on the market, including perfumes, flavours, and clothing. Some hobbyists have even begun to experiment with editing themselves.[8]

In 2018, researchers at the University of Alberta created horsepox (a virus related to the extinct smallpox) from scratch “by stitching together fragments of mail-order DNA in just six months for about $100,000.” Alarmingly, when the research was published it also included details on how to repeat it. This suggests that many labs would today be able to synthesize a very potent virus relatively easily. Reportedly the research team alerted Canadian authorities to the nature of their work and none raised any objections.[9]

There can be both promising benefits and deeply troubling harms created by synthetic biology. These new techniques raise significant social, ecological, ethical, and spiritual questions. Yet there has been no serious public discussion of these questions.

Many in the scientific community have argued that in general:

When an activity raises threats of harm to human health or the environment, precautionary measures should be taken even if some cause and effect relationships are not fully established scientifically. In this context the proponent of an activity, rather than the public, should bear the burden of proof. The process of applying the Precautionary Principle must be open, informed and democratic and must include potentially affected parties. It must also involve an examination of the full range of alternatives, including no action.[10]

Questions:

  1. Would you commit to proactively engaging the Canadian public in discussions of the social, ecological, ethical, and spiritual questions raised by new and emerging technologies? If so, how?
  2. Would you commit to enacting the precautionary principle with new biotechnologies? If so, how?
 

Other election resource kits that may be of interest

These resources were not written by CFSC and we don’t take any credit for them nor do we necessarily endorse the questions. We share them here because they cover additional topics that may be of interest.

Amnesty International Canada offers a comprehensive report card on human rights issues in Canada that includes many policy recommendations one could ask candidates for office about. https://www.amnesty.ca/sites/amnesty/files/Amnesty_HRA_2018-19_final_ENG.pdf

Assembly of First Nations has produced a resource which offers timelines and clear actions the next federal Government needs to take on areas such as: the environment, economic priorities, infrastructure, water, housing, healthcare, education, gender rights, Indigenous restorative justice, Indigenous rights, and honouring promises made and the relationships between the Crown and Indigenous peoples. https://www.afn.ca/2019-federal-election

Canadian Council of Churches, of which Quakers are members, has released a resource with sample questions on refugees, peace and disarmament, climate, reconciliation, poverty, access to quality palliative care, religious freedom, sexual exploitation, and healthcare https://www.councilofchurches.ca/news/2019-federal-election-guide

Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East have put together backgrounders and questions for candidates on 23 areas such as Canada’s involvement in the arms trade, banning nuclear weapons, and the profoundly troubling extradition law that led Hassan Diab to be sent to France and spend three years, often in solitary confinement, awaiting trial based on weak and irregular evidence. https://www.cjpme.org/mend_home

KAIROS Canada, of which Quakers are members, offers questions on ecological justice, gender justice, Indigenous peoples’ human rights, and migrant justice. https://www.kairoscanada.org/resources/federal-election-2019

Mennonite Central Committee Canada offers background and questions on migration, Indigenous peoples’ human rights, restorative justice, climate change, Palestine and Israel, and Syria and Iraq. They also have a resource guide on having better conversations on divisive issues: https://mcccanada.ca/stories/2019-federal-election-resource

The United Church of Canada offers instructions on how to set up a meeting of your local political candidates, what registered charities like Monthly Meetings can and can’t do around the election, and double-sided downloadable handouts with questions on Indigenous rights, climate justice, disability issues, healthcare, mining justice, peacebuilding, and refugees. https://www.united-church.ca/community-faith/get-involved/faith-and-politics


[1] Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Committee on the Rights of the Child, Concluding observations on the combined third and fourth periodic report of Canada, adopted by the Committee at its sixty-first session (17 September –5 October 2012), CRC/C/CAN/CO/3-4, http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/crc/docs/co/CRC-C-CAN-CO-3-4_en.pdf

[2] https://www.mmiwg-ffada.ca/final-report

[3] http://nctr.ca/reports.php

[4] https://quakerservice.ca/news/our-questions-about-canadas-defence-budget

[5] Steven Chase, “Canada now the second biggest arms exporter to Middle East, data show,” The Globe and Mail, June 14, 2016, http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/canada-now-the-second-biggest-arms-exporter-to-middle-east-data-show/article30459788

[6] World Bank Group and United Nations, “Pathways to Peace: Inclusive Approaches to Preventing Violent Conflict,” 2018, https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/28337, 4-5.

[7] For details about this see: https://canadianpeaceinitiative.ca/learn

[8] For these and other examples see our annual non-technical updates at https://quakerservice.ca/syntheticbiology

[9] Emily Baumgaertner, “As D.I.Y. Gene Editing Gains Popularity, ‘Someone Is Going to Get Hurt’,” The New York Times, May 14, 2018, https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/14/science/biohackers-gene-editing-virus.html

[10] Science & Environmental Health Network, “The Wingspread Consensus Statement on the Precautionary Principle,” January 26, 1998,http://www.sehn.org/wing.html