Mar 042014

Canadian Friends Service Committee has been facilitating a consultation and discernment process with Quakers from across Canada around issues raised by synthetic biology. Below is an article written by CFSC board member Fred Bass (Vancouver Monthly Meeting) which originally appeared in The Canadian Friend (reprinted here with permission). For more about these issues, read the Synthetic Biology Kit or contact us.

Synthetic biology research at NASA Ames - credit Alexander Van Dijk

Synthetic biology research at NASA Ames – credit Alexander Van Dijk

Move over, Nature (and God)—Synthetic Biology to the rescue!

Homo evolutis [1], published in 2010, celebrates synthetic biology. It names and defines the species that is about to succeed us, “a hominid that directly and deliberately controls evolution of its own and other species.”
So what is synthetic biology? It’s a new field that combines genetics, engineering, laboratory and computer science to produce new forms of life to meet human needs, such as food, fuel, pharmaceuticals, pollution control, cosmetics and information processing.
Synthetic biology doesn’t just change genes of existing creatures — it creates new creatures… new bacteria, plants, animals and perhaps people. Proudly and immodestly, Nature’s laboratory — evolution — may soon be replaced by science and technology.
Who’s involved? Researchers and academics around the world, including MIT, Harvard, U. Cal and many more, supported by major corporate investment and a little funding from government. The world’s largest chemical, energy, grain-trading and pharmaceutical companies, e.g. Monsanto, DuPont, British Petroleum, Shell, Novartis and International Flavours & Fragrances, have invested billions of dollars in synthetic biology. Government participation and regulation have been minimal, nationally and internationally.
What resources does synthetic biology require? Universities’ students, faculties and facilities and corporate research laboratories are essential. To capitalize on what is learned will require massive amounts of biomass (earth’s biological productivity: plants, soil, plankton, forests, etc). Large quantities of land in Africa, Asia and Latin American have already been purchased by corporations (& some universities) to gain access to biomass, water and other resources [2]. This acquisition is displacing local, traditional agriculture.
What social justice and ecological issues does synthetic biology present? A few are obvious: agricultural land grabbing, prioritizing cosmetics over food, defining the roles of the public and private sectors, solving safety issues and maintaining the health of natural ecosystems. How can potential threats from synthetic biology be prevented while gaining its benefits? More than 100 international, environmental, social & faith organizations (including the Biotechnology Reference Group of the Canadian Council of Churches [BRG/CCC]) have called for implementing the Precautionary Principle before releasing synthetic biology products for sale. This would include independent supervision of synthetic biology research and development, establishing safety measures, surveillance and protection against unintended effects.
Canadian Yearly Meeting in 2012 affirmed three actions in regard to synthetic biology: 1) Asking the BRG/CCC to raise, among all faith groups, awareness of the social and ecological issues related to development of this field. 2) Asking the Canadian Friends Service Committee (CFSC) to provide Canadian Monthly Meetings with basic information and alternative perspectives so 3) they could address three queries (How can the benefits of synthetic biology be applied equitably? How can damaging consequences to eco- and social systems be foreseen and forestalled? Are there zones of activity that should be set off limits for synthetic biology?).
CFSC has prepared an Information Kit (available at The Kit identifies (pages 2-3) four relevant Quaker-Institute-for-the-Future booklets (#2, 3, 5, 6). Sets of these were distributed to Monthly Meetings; each can be downloaded (see links in Kit). Appendix One summarizes QIF #2 Genetically Modified Crops: Promises, Perils, and the Need for Public Policy.
For a brief update on synthetic biology, please see both of the following links:
-from the proponents of synthetic biology:, and the book by George Church: Regenesis Mar 2013
-from those cautious about synthetic biology:, especially Synthetic Biology: The Bioeconomy of Landlessness and Hunger June, 2013
Many people feel reluctant to comment on synthetic biology because it appears to demand highly complex and technical knowledge. Quakers, more than many people, recognize other means of knowing — particularly when ethical issues are concerned — a direct, non-mediated wisdom derived from the inner power that lies within.
Ursula Franklin, a prominent Quaker and research physicist, noted that technology comprises more than machines or gadgets. It is a comprehensive system that involves “organization, procedures, symbols, new words, equations, and, most of all, a mindset.” [3] That system in Franklin’s view, is bent on “turning the globe into one giant commercial resource base, while denying a decent and appropriate habitat to many of the world’s citizens.” [4] Franklin also maintains that the uses of technology should not be preordained but adopted as a result of conscious choices. [5]  
In a democratic society, this means choice by an informed public. And that includes you. A Special Interest Group on Synthetic Biology is planned for the 2014 Canadian Yearly Meeting in Winnipeg.
Fred Bass, Vancouver Monthly Meeting
[1] Enriques, Juan; Gullans, Steve: Homo evolutis New Word City (on-line publisher) 2010
[3] Franklin, Ursula. (1992) The Real World of Technology. (CBC Massey lectures series.) Concord, ON: House of Anansi Press Limited. ISBN 0-88784-531-2, p 12
[4] Franklin, Ursula. (2006) The Ursula Franklin Reader: Pacifism as a Map. Toronto: Between the Lines Books. ISBN 1-897071-18-3, p 288
[5] Franklin, Ursula. (1992) ibid, p 192